Zodiac signs versus constellations
It is worth knowing at this stage that the twelve zodiac signs are
not the same thing as the twelve constellations (or star groups).
As we have seen above, the signs of the zodiac are twelve equal 30º sections
of the ecliptic, related to the seasonal year and anchored to the four
cardinal points of the Sun’s annual journey. Western astrology, which
is based on the seasonal year, uses the tropical or seasonal zodiac.
Indian or Vedic astrology uses the sidereal (or ‘star’) zodiac, based
on the positions of the stars in the actual constellations, which are
star groups of very different sizes. Owing to a phenomenon caused by
the earth’s ‘wobble’ on its axis, the two zodiacs have gradually, over
the last two thousand years or so, started to drift out of alignment
with each other.
Audience: Can you say more about this? I am not sure that I
understand.
Clare: Perhaps the best way to imagine this is as two concentric
circles, the outer circle representing the backdrop of the stars, containing
the twelve constellations, and the inner circle divided into the twelve
signs of the zodiac, each 30º in length. Approximately 2000 years ago
these two circles lined up, with the beginning of the constellation of
Aries and the beginning of the zodiac sign of Aries in the same place.
Since that time, these two circles have been moving in opposite directions
at the rate of 1º every 72 years. They will not line up again for approximately
26,000 years. This 26,000-year cycle has itself been divided into twelve ‘astrological
ages’ of approximately 2,000 years each.
For the last two thousand years, at the spring equinox
the Sun has in fact been rising against the constellation of Pisces and
will gradually begin to rise against the constellation of Aquarius, heralding
the start of the new astrological age referred to in the 1960s musical Hair as
the dawn of the Age of Aquarius. In another 2,000 years, when the Sun
begins to rise against the constellation of Capricorn, we will enter
a new ‘Age of Capricorn’, which doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.
The astrological ages have their own meanings too, although these are
on a quite different scale. Western astrology uses the tropical zodiac
as its primary frame of reference, and eastern, Indian or Vedic astrology
uses the sidereal zodiac as its primary frame of reference. The difference
between the two zodiacs is now approximately 26º.
Audience: Does that mean that my Sun could be in the previous
sign in sidereal astrology?
Clare: Yes, if your Sun is between 0º and 25º of a sign. Rather
than letting this bother us too much, I think we need to appreciate that
every culture has its own sky lore and its own astrology, which is an
expression of the history, mythology, religion and philosophy of the
culture in which it has developed. As a broad generalisation, we can
say that the western tropical zodiac is solar because we use a solar
calendar. This reflects the emphasis in western cultures on self-sufficiency,
self-expression and the development of the individual. The eastern sidereal
zodiac, on the other hand, belongs to cultures where the Moon is the
basis of the calendar and of the annual festivals. Eastern astrology
is not so focused on the development of the individual but puts the emphasis
on community and family and tends to take a more fated approach than
western psychological astrology. You will have experienced this for yourselves
if you have ever had your chart done in India. It is a much more fated
kind of astrology.

|