I request that your free charts include the true BML position and not the mean, the position of which can vary up to a highly significant 30 degrees.

Between the confusion people encounter sorting out the vague information available currently regarding the differences between the Black Moon, the asteroid Lilith and the Dark Moon, there are enough red herrings swimming around this area of work. By offering the true position in free charts by default, Astrodienst would be providing an extremely valuable service in the form of standing for what's really going on with the Lilith archetype, and thereby be on the cutting edge of this corner of astrology.

I apologize profusely for my misunderstanding.

Peace and blessings to you and yours.

I found your reports extremely accurate!!! However, I have a specific question about my relationship that I would really need to ask. Do you offer any private consultation where I could do so? If not, could you please recommend someone? I will be in Zollikon next year in March.

I was not to happy with the long term horoscope I purchased from you recently.

Jupiter entered the sign that it rules, Sagittarius, on November 23rd, 2006, and will stay in this sign until December 2007.

The report did not mention anything on how this may affect me and what if it left out other important aspects for the years following 2007.

Not to happy :( would like a refund.

Regards,

Il est vrai que j’ai certaines grosses zones d’ombres et que j’essaie d’y voir clair depuis un certain moment et qu’il n’est pas simple d’y faire face mais me retrouver face à elle avec ce portrait qui me les relataient noir sur blanc est quelque chose d’assez troublant.

For example:

I have-

North Node in Leo at 26.25 Degrees
Vertex in Libra at 26.57 Degrees
Jupiter in Capricorn at 27.27 Degrees

astro.com does NOT mention Vertex or Jupiter Aspecting my NN in their grid.

If you think, well, it must be the Orb they use - I have Uranus in Leo at 28.46 Degrees which DOES show up in the grid as a Conjunction even though it's further away than the two above.

The only other Aspect which DOES show up on the grid is North Node Square Ascendant, although it's at 29.41 Degrees, still further away.

WHY ????????? And is there a work-around I can tell my students about so this doesn't happen to them?

Har i overvejet at tilføje en særskilt sundheds- helbredsprognose?

Efter min mening er dette ellers den dejligste af alle astrologitjenester på nettet, så veludført og professionel på alle måder. Og så rammende. Tak! Jeg er meget glad for at kunne benytte mig af den.

Wanting to order a second version of our relation horoscope in the manner that the other partner is spoken too, I can't find a space in the order facilities to fill in the code of our first version.
Could you please help me out ?

I purchased the hardcopy of my psychological horoscope analysis several years ago and was puzzled then by this odd word or phrase in my otherwise English translation horoscope. The original was lost long ago in a move and I repurchased it in pdf format this week.

On delivery the anamoly persists unchanged from years ago. The title page says Psychological Horoscope Analysis for

My Name, geb. My birth data.

Have done internet search now for the meaning of geb or even what language it represents. I presume it means ... born ...

However, my search yields info that geb is spelled with a capital G and refers to an Eygptian Earthy God who was father of Kronos.

I was not asking for help when I wrote in, I was just replying to Aldo. I do stand by what I said in my post then, namely that therapists, regardless of how well qualified they may be, and regardless of their theoretical orientation, are human beings first. Consequently, they are not necessarily wiser than anyone else, and they most certainly are not necessarily any more objective than anyone else.

I have a suggestion for the selection criteria of the important long-term influences delineations in the Personal Daily Horoscope. The suggestion is this: to determine first if there are long-term transits occurring to planets already in relationship in the natal chart and if so, to give those first priority.

For example, in my chart Jupiter, Saturn and Pluto are all at 11 degrees, though they are in different signs. Since transits to the three planets always happen simultaneously, I would like to be able to read the delineations for them together. Today I can read the delineations for Mercury aspecting Saturn and Pluto but not for its aspect to Jupiter. I think that seeing them listed together would remind me of the natal relationship and help me to notice how planetary aspects affect my particular configuration.

As always, you have my deepest respect and gratitude for the excellence of your site.

I speak from sad experience, since a couple of years ago I decided to enter Jungian analysis, and I felt the same as you. So I chose someone whose qualifications as an analyst were impeccable, and who also had the certificate from the Faculty of Astrological Studies she had gotten her qualifications as a Jungian analyst in Zurich, and had even attended at least one of Liz Greene's seminars while there. She listed astrology as one of her interests on her website based on that, I chose her from a long list of qualified Jungian analysts.

1. Much as I appreciate your response to my feedback, I must say I was (and still am) hoping to get a hint or two on this issue from Mr Treindl or the website's designer, Mr J.V. Stork (unless he's no longer with the staff).
2. I agree that it makes sense to fix problems where they are, as opposed to fixing problems where there are none.
3. Let me just clarify one thing: when I said: 'the contents of a single Astrodienst webpage fill only the left half of the total area of the display' I meant neither of the following: (a) the width of my browser window is half the width of the display, (b) the width of the webpage in a fully expanded browser window is half the width of the browser window. I meant this: in a fully expanded browser window the webpage takes up the entire window but the readable and otherwise interactive content entends from the left side of the window to about half its width.
4. You said you also use this type of display and the same resolution. Could you please also specify which operating system and what browser you use? If you use MS operating system, could you please share your display DPI setting (rightclick anywhere on the desktop - all windows closed - then click Properties - Settings - Advanced)? If you use IE: could you please advise whether you use a specific user style sheet (Tools - Internet Options - Accessibility)?

Here's a technical question: I use a 17-in LCD (res. 1280x1024) and the contents of a single Astrodienst webpage fill only the left half of the total area of the display. I hasten to add it doesn't in any way apply exclusively to your website. However, there are sites that somehow automatically adjust the contents of a webpage to neatly fit whatever type of screen or display or resolution you're using. Would it be possible by any chance to modify the source markup of your pages along the same lines? I know I can work with zoom levels and other browser settings (Accessibility - Formatting in IE) but these (esp. the latter) can really mangle the layout.

Unlike binary logic programming, earthlife (expressed in either biological sex or social gender) is a bit more complex than substituting pronouns after a search, eradicate and replace mission, or after a series of forced choices between if/then tests is transformed into a character string assignment. I believe you that your current programming structure is somehow configured in this or some equivalent manner. I was and am still hoping your approach to psychological astrology and the use of artificial intelligence could be stretched to a bit further sophistication.

Gender is a culturally determined root construct underlying most social communication. It may or may not parallel very closely the biological sex that parents and/or doctors thought they saw at birth, and in some cases struggled to figure out. For at least a few thousand years on this planet the humans who prefer their distinctive dualing (of he versus she, black versus white, switched on vs off, and prime versus zero) have frankly had plenty of catering to... if not held nearly absolute sway. However, black and white are not lost in a full color world nor on the computer screen. That may be a fear. In some cases an illusion when the light level is low. Instead their communication value and opportunities for higher resolution, as well as richer and deeper expression are vastly enhanced. Okay. May there is a cost to upgrade, but I don't know very many people who really want to go back to monochrome now that they've seen with more clarity than the limits of using only their peripheral vision.

I strongly doubt that the Cosmos pre-determined that specific energy patterns were really supposed to be assigned to a few dominate myths, mostly of western european origin, and then restricted to the resultant human traits and gender assignments chosen by the the carvers of Western Civilization. You may have a different perspective, but I imagine that western mythology has been grafted onto the cosmic energy patterns, and when associated with sufficiently powerful political or religious movements also deeply grafted into our language and behavioral roles... unfortunately grafted along with the potential for numerous noisy signals, bugs, typos and mutations in the process of code translation. The latter are problems that grow in magnitude when critical programming languages underlying nearly all social communication on Terra Firma can only be imagined as either/or binary systems.

It would be truly refreshing to see some original aquarian-like thoughts that attempt to launch us beyond a few of these boundaries to see what else can unfold before our expanding vision -- maybe there is something better awaitng and without the apparent and curious contradictions mentioned in Michal's feedback to which you referred me.

By the way. I'm puzzled. Why would your programming need to delete the grand He's and She's you already employ for those people who want them and/or feel proud to be so identified -- just in order to create an additional option ( or options) for those of us who are not are rare as you may think and whose anatomical and cosmic fingerprints, much less our gender role choices, simply fail to conform to monochrome worlds and skyscapes.

It seems you might already be nearly prepared for some progressions. Your personal horoscopes already solve most of the personal pronoun dilemma -- they refer to the primary reader as you and your. When I sign on as a female (or male) the daily horoscopes already differentiate potentialities which might occur in various types of relationships (business, social or romantic) with women from those which might occur with men. Your partner horoscopes likewise already give the option of naming whether the partner is a male or female (and an additional option or options could be added).

Hence nothing needs to be lost, and you language would not necessarily become anymore gender neutral for all those situations when the user wants to intentionally choose male or female. Rather than losing, wouldn't you gain greater relevance? And it would open countlless doorways besides those about initial pronoun assignments for future software development and individualization.

Funny thing. Your response that in accomodating my request somehow much would be lost seems to parallel the typical first reaction, regardless of the context, when other people are asked to contemplate a broader universe for biological sex and social gender. So you are not alone. You have more company than I do.

So from the comfort and vastness of being in the majority, can you think about it again. Is this somehow threatening? Why? Why would leaving space for another person to be both, neither or something entirely different necessarily diminish the boundaries that He and She have already conquested, conquered, and controlled. We are not on a crowded island here -- we are talking about the infinity of space. My point of view is the majority of you can still have your cake to possess and eat either way. Actually its the requirement to ignore a part of my anatomy, biology and psyche every time I am required to check one but only one of those darn FM boxes at a time that results in a loss. But, its not just me that loses, or others like me. Its majority of you who also lose the full potential that contemplating and incorporating our diversity would bring to you and to our world once the rest of us could exist in it openly as whole entities.

Space, somewhere between its macro- and micro-cosmos must surely have a few additional dimensions tucked between the darkest corners and brightest stars where you could travel and find a multi-faceted box, return home and place it gently next to Male and Female, grant it a provisional name such as the Rest of Us, the Other, Mystery, Yet to be revealed, or ___________, but please do better than calling us...it.

I may be wrong. You revised your first reply to Michal. Maybe someday you and our world can revise your replies to my question as well. I still want to believe that after the first reflex and clonus have died down, a bit of dreaming and more thought by people as skilled as those on your staff in recognizing the power and importance of symbolism can react different. I still hope you might also grasp the symbolic significance of recognizing and positively accomodating this fundamental root of diversity in the human species, in much of the animal and plant kingdoms, and beyond -- perhaps in the heart of our LifeForce.

As many astrologers, I suspect including you would argue, the restriction of astrology to only a solar chart printed in the Sunday tabloid is far too simplistic and often misleading. Sun and Moon aren't really enough either. Now even the most basic chart requires at the very least 3 points -- Sun, Moon and Ascendent. But the drive for colors, sounds, textures and flavors in order to compose a more holistic, accurate and recognizable experience is what already underlies your very need for the computer calculations and artifical intelligence you've crafted here. So...Does adding an Ascendant calculation make you lose the value of Sun and Moon?

Respectfully,

Thank you for your answer. I tried to see how to contact you personally, but could not find an e-mail address.

For example if your Moon is in the 4th house in your natural birth chart, it may be in the 9th/10th in London - and the appropriate interpretation of that would be valid IN THAT PLACE. We do not change character in other locations but you may feel more happy/inspired/ambitious/healthy etc in one location than another. Your basic character CAN be influenced by the energies in the place you currently live.

The variety of transits, sometimes with opposite influences on any given day indeed seem to parallel of the complexities of daily life. Micro- and macrocosm are usually a blend of balancing influences to maintain the center (or in phsyiology -- homeostasis).

There is something I am now wishing your site would accomodate, even be the pioneers for other astrologists. Astrology and alchemy both are integrative intuitive systems more likely to recognize and struggle with traits including gender and biological sex which fall on a continuum and are not really descrete and opposite categories -- shown repeatedly to be the case in many species besides humans.

Would very much like to see you lead the way in accepting that some of us are neither exactly male or female. It would be nice to finally have a site that does not force making such a choice when none currently offered really fits, simply in order to proceed at all in obtaining a reading.